27-12-2025, 07:14 AM
I run a community site (a forum for remote teams) and I'm constantly pitched "thought leadership" pieces to publish. Honestly, 95% of them feel like they were generated by an AI trained on LinkedIn fluff—all jargon, no genuine insight or practical advice.
I know valuable, experience-driven articles exist, but they’re getting drowned out. As someone who has to sift through this daily, it’s exhausting.
Has anyone else in a similar position found a good way to filter for the genuine stuff? Or am I just being too cynical? How do you spot a truly valuable article vs. a content mill placeholder?
I know valuable, experience-driven articles exist, but they’re getting drowned out. As someone who has to sift through this daily, it’s exhausting.
Has anyone else in a similar position found a good way to filter for the genuine stuff? Or am I just being too cynical? How do you spot a truly valuable article vs. a content mill placeholder?
